|
|
Post by Admin Cincinnatus on Feb 25, 2015 10:00:22 GMT -5
Yeah, sure... just keep on lying there buddy  |
|
|
|
Post by figfiggins on Feb 25, 2015 10:00:53 GMT -5
Tame Impala.
|
|
|
|
Post by Buoy on Feb 25, 2015 10:00:57 GMT -5
Tame Impala
|
|
|
|
Post by joel on Feb 25, 2015 10:01:21 GMT -5
Yep. When you reverse Google search it, you get "Sleeping Impala"
|
|
|
|
Post by tbhooptie on Feb 25, 2015 10:02:36 GMT -5
Tame Impala... cant say I am familiar...
|
|
|
|
Post by evenpjflow on Feb 25, 2015 10:02:58 GMT -5
That will excite some people for sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by joel on Feb 25, 2015 10:05:17 GMT -5
I'm not a huge fan, but they aren't bad. They are going to be higher up on the card. They might occupy the spot right before the headliner one night.
|
|
|
|
Post by tbhooptie on Feb 25, 2015 10:06:50 GMT -5
Youtube'd em... I recognize the songs... I agree, not a big fan.
|
|
|
|
Post by evenpjflow on Feb 25, 2015 10:06:59 GMT -5
I'm not a huge fan either but I know people who are. They are ok.
|
|
|
|
Post by kbach on Feb 25, 2015 10:07:07 GMT -5
I always thought they sounded similar to the Beatles. The lead singer sounds a bit like John Lennon. I may be crazy, but that's just my opinion. I like them though, so this is pretty cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by rodney4130 on Feb 25, 2015 10:08:30 GMT -5
That *might* be a headliner.
|
|
|
|
Post by figfiggins on Feb 25, 2015 10:09:54 GMT -5
That *might* be a headliner. Doubt it, I'd be a little disappointed if that were the case. |
|
|
|
Post by WhereIsPassionPit on Feb 25, 2015 10:13:21 GMT -5
You all are out of your minds! Tame Impala are once of the best bands this festival has ever booked! How are people not freaking out about this? Could and should be a headliner
|
|
|
|
Post by thefudgefactory on Feb 25, 2015 10:13:52 GMT -5
That *might* be a headliner. Doubt it, I'd be a little disappointed if that were the case. They are one of the headliners at Shaky Knees so I wouldn't be surprised if they were at Bunbury. |
|
|
|
Post by kbach on Feb 25, 2015 10:15:13 GMT -5
How do you guys think/want them to announce the lineup? I hope they go one tweet at a time starting with the Lego house. Essentially all 21 clues. Then start naming the other bands, and then announce the headliners. I hope we don't have a tweet at 9:00 AM that has a picture of the lineup. I want some buildup.
|
|
|
|
Post by figfiggins on Feb 25, 2015 10:20:04 GMT -5
Doubt it, I'd be a little disappointed if that were the case. They are one of the headliners at Shaky Knees so I wouldn't be surprised if they were at Bunbury. Oh damn haha I guess I underestimated how big they are. |
|
|
|
Post by riverstage on Feb 25, 2015 10:27:16 GMT -5
Excited by Tame Impala, would rather them not be a headliner though. And on the Shaky Knees lineup poster they're third line, not a headliner, so I think they could be second line for us too.
|
|
|
|
Post by WhereIsPassionPit on Feb 25, 2015 10:28:34 GMT -5
They are one of the headliners at Shaky Knees so I wouldn't be surprised if they were at Bunbury. Oh damn haha I guess I underestimated how big they are. They're a pre-headliner for Coachella too. Seriously if you guys haven't checked these guys out you have some homework. Lonerism has to be one of the best albums of the past 5 years. Saw them play in Louisville a couple of years ago and they didn't disappoint. |
|
|
|
Post by kbach on Feb 25, 2015 10:29:06 GMT -5
Excited by Tame Impala, would rather them not be a headliner though. And on the Shaky Knees lineup poster they're third line, not a headliner, so I think they could be second line for us too. They are headlining Sunday if you look at the day by day lineup. |
|
|
|
Post by thefudgefactory on Feb 25, 2015 10:29:33 GMT -5
Excited by Tame Impala, would rather them not be a headliner though. And on the Shaky Knees lineup poster they're second line, not a headliner, so I think they could be second line for us too. Maybe on the full lineup poster, but on the daily lineups they are top billed on Sunday. |
|
|
|
Post by bruno on Feb 25, 2015 10:31:40 GMT -5
They are one of the headliners at Shaky Knees so I wouldn't be surprised if they were at Bunbury. Oh damn haha I guess I underestimated how big they are. Maybe with the last 3 daytime hints, they've been announcing the 2nd billed band each night with Matt & Kim, Walk the Moon and Tame Impala? I agree with the sentiment of many here, I'm personally not a fan of Tame Impala, but they're a good get for the festival since they do have a large following...I just don't go for psychedelic rock personally. |
|
|
|
Post by riverstage on Feb 25, 2015 10:32:49 GMT -5
Excited by Tame Impala, would rather them not be a headliner though. And on the Shaky Knees lineup poster they're second line, not a headliner, so I think they could be second line for us too. Maybe on the full lineup poster, but on the daily lineups they are top billed on Sunday. True, didn't see that. I feel like something happened with that schedule though because the poster they released with the lineup made it look like the Strokes, Avett Brothers, and Wilco would headline, which makes more sense in my opinion, strange. |
|
|
|
Post by figfiggins on Feb 25, 2015 11:13:35 GMT -5
Oh damn haha I guess I underestimated how big they are. Maybe with the last 3 daytime hints, they've been announcing the 2nd billed band each night with Matt & Kim, Walk the Moon and Tame Impala? I agree with the sentiment of many here, I'm personally not a fan of Tame Impala, but they're a good get for the festival since they do have a large following...I just don't go for psychedelic rock personally. If you're thinking Walk the Moon and Matt & Kim could be headliners, I really hope not. Don't get me wrong, I love them, but I was really hoping for bands a lot bigger than them to headline. |
|
|
|
Post by spazzyjanet on Feb 25, 2015 11:22:27 GMT -5
Meh. I'm not into the 60s retro thing. Tame Impala and Temoles will get someone excited though. I hope they aren't a headliner.
|
|
|
|
Post by tbhooptie on Feb 25, 2015 11:28:33 GMT -5
I would think with Promowest, there will be larger headliners...
I hope!
|
|
|
|
Post by WhereIsPassionPit on Feb 25, 2015 11:36:56 GMT -5
I'm still on a high from this hint. Such a refreshing addition to the plethora of pop bands aimed at 15yr old girls. Only in Cincinnati would people be more excited about fucking Bleachers than Tame Impala.
|
|
|
|
Post by cincinnatisound on Feb 25, 2015 11:42:12 GMT -5
I'm still on a high from this hint. Such a refreshing addition to the plethora of pop bands aimed at 15yr old girls. Only in Cincinnati would people be more excited about fucking Bleachers than Tame Impala. I'm gonna have to do my research, I've heard little to nothing about them. |
|
|
|
Post by thefestographer on Feb 25, 2015 11:57:13 GMT -5
Maybe with the last 3 daytime hints, they've been announcing the 2nd billed band each night with Matt & Kim, Walk the Moon and Tame Impala? I agree with the sentiment of many here, I'm personally not a fan of Tame Impala, but they're a good get for the festival since they do have a large following...I just don't go for psychedelic rock personally. If you're thinking Walk the Moon and Matt & Kim could be headliners, I really hope not. Don't get me wrong, I love them, but I was really hoping for bands a lot bigger than them to headline. Yeah I'd say they'd be more like 2nd or 3rd line. |
|
|
|
Post by bruno on Feb 25, 2015 12:10:49 GMT -5
If you're thinking Walk the Moon and Matt & Kim could be headliners, I really hope not. Don't get me wrong, I love them, but I was really hoping for bands a lot bigger than them to headline. Yeah I'd say they'd be more like 2nd or 3rd line. I'm meaning 2nd to last band to perform each day, last show on the river stage. I could see these being the 2nd to last show on the main stage as well though...not saying headliners. |
|
|
|
Post by figfiggins on Feb 25, 2015 12:12:46 GMT -5
Yeah I'd say they'd be more like 2nd or 3rd line. I'm meaning 2nd to last band to perform each day, last show on the river stage. I could see these being the 2nd to last show on the main stage as well though...not saying headliners. Ah, okay. That's more likely. I misunderstood what you were saying. |
|
